<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>153 &#187; Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sblogs.com/153/category/culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s next for the Laetare Medal?</title>
		<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholic-spectator.com/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Mary Ann Glendon having declined to receive the Laetare Medal from Notre Dame —&#160; because of the way she was being used as a way of balancing the university’s controversial and Bishop-defying decision to honor President Obama — one has to wonder exactly who Notre Dame will pick as their second choice. They will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Mary Ann Glendon having <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j6Yrs9MYliOAhf5vv1pShKraTJSQD97R0LBG0">declined to receive</a> the Laetare Medal from Notre Dame —&#160; because of the way she was being used as a way of balancing the university’s controversial and Bishop-defying decision to honor President Obama — one has to wonder exactly who Notre Dame will pick as their second choice. They will risk stepping in to the middle of a firestorm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angels or demons?</title>
		<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/24/angels-or-demons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/24/angels-or-demons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholic-spectator.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the movie-version of Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons about to be released, the director, Ron Howard, is eager to paint the movie in a positive light. So when William Donohue of the Catholic League complained of the makers’ “animus against all things Catholic”, Howard penned a note to the Huffington Post, complaining that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the movie-version of Dan Brown’s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angels_%26_Demons">Angels and Demons</a> about to be released, the director, Ron Howard, is eager to paint the movie in a positive light. So when William Donohue of the Catholic League complained of the makers’ “animus against all things Catholic”, Howard penned <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-howard/iangels-demonsi-its-a-thr_b_189053.html">a note to the Huffington Post</a>, complaining that the movie was fiction, and thus shouldn&#8217;t be taken as really applying to the real Catholic Church. One of Howard’s defenses is that though he can list off the usual suspects — he brings up Galileo, the Inquisition, and the Crusades — none of those events are actually in the movie, but only fictional stuff. So why worry? Pay for a ticket first, and then decide.</p>
<p>There is plenty to lampoon in Howard’s piece (he has a curious knack for coming across as saying the opposite of what he seems to be saying). The <a href="http://www.splendoroftruth.com/curtjester/archives/2009/04/its-a-thriller.php">Curt Jester lampoons</a> one consequence of following Howard’s lines of argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/24/angels-or-demons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
