<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>153 &#187; Clergy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sblogs.com/153/category/clergy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s next for the Laetare Medal?</title>
		<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholic-spectator.com/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Mary Ann Glendon having declined to receive the Laetare Medal from Notre Dame —&#160; because of the way she was being used as a way of balancing the university’s controversial and Bishop-defying decision to honor President Obama — one has to wonder exactly who Notre Dame will pick as their second choice. They will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Mary Ann Glendon having <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j6Yrs9MYliOAhf5vv1pShKraTJSQD97R0LBG0">declined to receive</a> the Laetare Medal from Notre Dame —&#160; because of the way she was being used as a way of balancing the university’s controversial and Bishop-defying decision to honor President Obama — one has to wonder exactly who Notre Dame will pick as their second choice. They will risk stepping in to the middle of a firestorm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/27/whos-next-for-the-laetare-medal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New NY Archbishop Dolan interview</title>
		<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/25/new-ny-archbishop-dolan-interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/25/new-ny-archbishop-dolan-interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clergy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholic-spectator.com/2009/04/25/new-ny-archbishop-dolan-interview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Archbishop Dolan is quickly stepping up to the challenges of being the newest Archbishop of New York. Father Zuhlsdorf over at What Does the Prayer Really Say? has a look through an interview Dolan gave to the New York Post, and likes it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archbishop Dolan is quickly stepping up to the challenges of being the newest Archbishop of New York. Father Zuhlsdorf over at What Does the Prayer Really Say? has <a href="http://wdtprs.com/blog/2009/04/archbishop-dolan-hits-the-ground-running-in-nyc/">a look through</a> an interview Dolan <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/04232009/news/regionalnews/tamper_with_marriage__were_in_big_troubl_165728.htm">gave to the New York Post</a>, and likes it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/25/new-ny-archbishop-dolan-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sebelius veto</title>
		<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/25/sebelius-veto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/25/sebelius-veto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholic-spectator.com/2009/04/25/sebelius-veto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kansas Catholic Conference (the official voice of the Catholic Church in Kansas on matters of public policy) has responded to Governor Sebelius’ veto of a bill that would significantly aid the enforcement of Kansas’ existing late-term abortion law.
Kansas, despite having one of the strictest late-term abortion laws in the country, is internationally known as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kansas Catholic Conference (the official voice of the Catholic Church in Kansas on matters of public policy) has responded to Governor Sebelius’ veto of a bill that would significantly aid the enforcement of Kansas’ existing late-term abortion law.</p>
<blockquote><p>Kansas, despite having one of the strictest late-term abortion laws in the country, is internationally known as a haven for the practice of particularly barbaric late-term abortion procedures – the kind most abortionists will not do. And no one has done more to ensure that Kansas retains its status as sanctuary for the likes of George Tiller than Governor Sebelius.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The full statement <a href="http://www.kscathconf.org/bins/site/templates/splash.asp?NC=6687X">here</a>. (H/T <a href="http://catholickey.blogspot.com/2009/04/kansas-bishops-conference-responds-to.html">The Catholic Key Blog</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/25/sebelius-veto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A cardinal for the House?</title>
		<link>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/24/a-cardinal-for-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/24/a-cardinal-for-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholic-spectator.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The possibility that the British Cardinal O’Connor might take up a place in the House of Lords (to explain this to US readers: it’s a sort of a Senatorial office, but with much less direct power) is continuing to cause controversy, since the Catholic Church has fairly strongly moved away from the idea that clergy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The possibility that the British Cardinal O’Connor might take up a place in the House of Lords (to explain this to US readers: it’s a sort of a Senatorial office, but with much less direct power) is continuing to cause controversy, since the Catholic Church has fairly strongly moved away from the idea that clergy at any level should be involved in politics. A <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/apr/23/cormac-lord-peerage-cardinal">commentary in the Guardian</a> gives some further reasons why O’Connor should not accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sblogs.com/153/2009/04/24/a-cardinal-for-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
